On Friday 18 December 2009 15:03, Paul Ishenin wrote: > Mattias Gärtner wrote: > > Speaking for myself: I use the dialog sometimes a hundred times a day > > and so I need a quick frontend where I can quickly set what to build > > and define the options. I don't care where the buttons are placed or > > if the widgetset is a combobox. But all options should be on one > > page/panel/control. Profiles will not help me much. Of course this > > page could be hidden by default. > > +1 > > I don't know why but once per year we get a new idea of how to improve > this dialog :) Personally I like it as it is now. I can quickly rebuild > the part I need with desired settings. I never used the previous year > improvement - the Quick Build Options page. If profiles are really > needed then I don't argue if they go to the same Quick Build Options page > :)
We'll I use it, but it's bit boring to type options everytime when I want to crosscompile for win32 under linux. So that's why I need some kind of profile's. I prefer build dialog as it is now (quick build options means nothing to me - I don't use it at all), only one thing is needed : if I choose win32, then I want that my options are loaded from somewhere for win32, so I don't need it to type it each time I want to crosscompile ide. So, just few changes are needed in current dialog: 1.combo box instead of TEdit control for Target OS/CPU 2.Options saving/reloading per TargetOS/CPU zeljko -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
