IDECommandStrs: array[0..*] of TIdentMapEntry = (
IDECommandStrs: array[0..auto] of TIdentMapEntry = (
IDECommandStrs: array[0..end] of TIdentMapEntry = (
I would vote for "auto".
I wont, since the following would fail:
const
auto = 10;
arr: [1..auto] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
That's an issue, yes. Although, in this case the constant "auto" could be independend from the keyword "auto". So it would not fail. Instead constant and array size would not be related in any way (although it appears like that).
I would go for
arr: [1..] of Integer = (1, 2, 3);
Would be as good as any other. To me it makes sense too.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
