On 1/20/2010 16:55, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:30:55 -0500
waldo kitty<[email protected]> wrote:
On 1/20/2010 06:12, Alexander Klenin wrote:
From PropEditUtils.pas (recently split by me from PropEditS.pp):
TGetStringProc = procedure(const s:ansistring) of object;
From Classes.pp:
TGetStrProc = procedure(const S: string) of object;
I think TGetStringProc is redundant and should be removed.
Should I prepare a patch?
i notice that one is "string" and the other is "ansistring"... aren't they
different enough to possibly cause problems where one is expected by the use of
the old routine and suddenly the new one doesn't support the same?
No, both are ansistring.
ok... thanks for that... i was unaware that type "string" was an alias for
"ansistring"... i had thought that "string" was the same as the old borland
"string" definition (ie: array of chars with the [0] element containing the
string length) ;)
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
