On 6 February 2010 10:46, zeljko <zel...@holobit.net> wrote: >> But that could also be explain as follows... not as many people are >> using the LCL-Qt widgetset compared to the LCL-GTK2 widgetset. :-) > > well, over 3500 client machines happily runs LCL-Qt apps
I meant, used by various developers, not a single app deployed to many. Either way, good to hear that your clients are happy. One more plus point to FPC & Lazarus. :) > there's no arguing about anything (was CLX before LCL-Qt). > I can confirm that quality of LCL-Qt and lazarus qt is better than K3 at Kylix 3 was crap from the day it was released. :) The only thing Kylix 3 still does better than Lazarus+FPC is debugging. I am still using log files (like I did in the early 90's) when debugging under FPC+Lazarus - that says a lot. FPC+Lazarus still have a long way to go in this regard, but they have made some nice improvements it the last couple of months. > Goodbye borland,codegear,embarcadero FOREVER. I've done that 5 years ago, and haven't looked back since. :-) -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
