On 8 March 2010 23:44, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: >> So no I don't agree with you. Based simply on the above progress with >> the fixes branch, I regard this message thread as a success. A >> problem, no stable updated Lazarus, is now fixed. > > Try "fixes branch doesn't compile/work" as subject next time.
And you really thing it wasn't mentioned before?? Maybe you should start reading the mailing lists in more detail before getting your knickers in a twist. This fixes branch issue was report just after it was caused. Since then, it was reported by myself and many others - just nothing came from those reports. Hence this message thread. Also patches (available fixes that simply need to be applied) were lying in Mantis not being attended to for weeks or months. Hence this message thread. So again, NO I wasn't simply complaining about nothing. I wasn't advising a new workflow, I wasn't advising a new repository system, I wasn't advising a new widgetset. I was concerned about know issues or available patches not being address. What more can we do than submit bug reports or supply patches to Mantis. It's up to you guys with write access to the repository to do the rest!! -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
