On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:03:08 -0300 Flávio Etrusco <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Mattias Gaertner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:34:42 -0300 > > Flávio Etrusco <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>[...] > >> If that's not desirable, shouldn't the .lrs files force a codepage in > >> its "header"? Otherwise we get spurious changes when the files are > >> generated in different systems... > > > > lrs files are plain ASCII. They are the same in any 8bit codepage. > > > > What "spurious changes"? > > > > Mattias > > Do you mean "plain ASCII" or "plain text"? AFAICS they are generate > with sytem's default codepage, which for most modern Linux systems is > UTF8, different to Windows' native/ANSI codepages. At least this is > how a I interpreted the spurious changes that were generated when I > added images to the IDE and needed to (re)generate the .lrs files. The lrs only use characters from #10,#13,#32..#126. The line endings are different, but this is handled by a good version control system automatically. Some months ago the lrs comment was translated, which created differences. Maybe you checked with an old version? Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
