On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:03:08 -0300 > Flávio Etrusco <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Mattias Gaertner >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:34:42 -0300 >> > Flávio Etrusco <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>[...] >> >> If that's not desirable, shouldn't the .lrs files force a codepage in >> >> its "header"? Otherwise we get spurious changes when the files are >> >> generated in different systems... >> > >> > lrs files are plain ASCII. They are the same in any 8bit codepage. >> > >> > What "spurious changes"? >> > >> > Mattias >> >> Do you mean "plain ASCII" or "plain text"? AFAICS they are generate >> with sytem's default codepage, which for most modern Linux systems is >> UTF8, different to Windows' native/ANSI codepages. At least this is >> how a I interpreted the spurious changes that were generated when I >> added images to the IDE and needed to (re)generate the .lrs files. > > The lrs only use characters from #10,#13,#32..#126. > The line endings are different, but this is handled by a good version > control system automatically. > > Some months ago the lrs comment was translated, which created > differences. Maybe you checked with an old version? > > Mattias >
I don't know. How do you explain these changes: http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/images/bookmark.lrs?root=lazarus&r1=24264&r2=24263&pathrev=24264 Best regards, Flávio -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
