Hello Lazarus-List, Friday, April 16, 2010, 3:02:37 PM, you wrote:
>> Is there any reason to be published instead public ? Maybe to garantee >> that the functions will never be removed by fpc/linker if not directly >> used in the code ? MW> there is a "virtual" classtree build based on RTTI. RTTI is only MW> generated for published methods So this limits the possibility of the LCL to left out parts not being used in the program, as every class and method is references in some way by a published method. And now the question :) should I in LCLfpgui move the public methods to published section (when ancestor is published of course) ? It is just to get a more hint clear compilation. -- Best regards, José -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
