On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/5/7 Michael Van Canneyt : >> >> Mattias' explanation is what I meant with 'there is more than the editor to >> lazarus'. > > Yes I understood that. My point about "not being feasible" is that the > forms designer is way to integrated into the rest of the IDE, that > it's not simply a job of moving some units into new project and > compile as a stand-alone app (process simplified for this message). > Meaning the IDE is not that modular.
On the contrary, it seems very modular, but for a complex goal you need more complicate integration. If you were forced to use the designer wholesale, and depend on Lazarus package format, etc, then it wasn't modular ;-) I would infer from Mattias' post that if you don't use external form references, frames or visual form inheritance, it's feasible and relatively easy/straight-forward. Best regards, Flávio -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
