On 11 May 2010 17:15, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/05/2010 17:11, zeljko wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 11 May 2010 18:02, Henry Vermaak wrote: >> >>> >>> On 11 May 2010 16:51, Martin<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I finally convinced myself to try installing QT, despite the massive >>>> size, and the huge amount of files that seem mre than just a runtime >>>> (designer.exe surely is not needed to run lazarus?) >>>> >>>> So I got qt 4-6-2 installed from qt-win-opensource-4.6.2-vs2008 >>>> >> >> this is wrong -> qt-win-opensource-4.6.2-vs2008 >> This is correct one: >> http://get.qt.nokia.com/qt/source/qt-win-opensource-4.6.2-mingw.exe >> > > That was what I did fear the answer would be..... > > How does a none tech person use QT on Windows, then => because the above > installation asks you where youre mingw installation is => So in order to > use QT, you must first install mingw by hand too..... > > > yes there is the QT-IDE-full-development environment, which supposedly > contains all of it => but a none tech (or none developer) would not need to > install a full IDE, just to use an app that needs QT? > > So (putting aside that I want to use Lazarus, and I am a developer), If I > wasn't ... => it would be trouble to use anything that is based on QT... => > that can't possible be. > > so where is the point I am missing?
That the app that uses QT would distribute all the necessary libs? Henry -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
