On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 16:00 +0700, Bee Jay wrote: > On 28 Mei 2010, at 15:10, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > Gateway? Why? > > There are some situations when gateway could provide a better solution.
Can you name me one? > > That's even slower then normal cgi. Because the gateway is > > in fact an cgi aplication that calls your fastcgi application. > > I believe you already know that speed isn't everything in software > development. Well, according to me there is no reason why you would use fastcgi besides speed. (Caching and startuptimes) > > Fcgi is the same as cgi. Except that the process is started once and not > > for each call. > > Then, they're different, at least too me. ;) Offcourse they are. But not for the framework. Joost. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
