Well, I don't have any more reasons to present. Just tell me when you'll have finally decided about which parser to use as a base and if it is not the compiler's one (based on this discussion it seems too hard for me) I hereby offer my help in developing it. I can help in both design/coding or documenting. (after getting familiar with the code, of course) I'm a university student, I'll have some time in the summer. (though I don't promise this will be my first priority) In case no constructive result comes out of this debate, obviously I can help with other parts of lazarus as well (if needed). :)
2010/5/31 Adem <[email protected]> > On 2010-05-31 16:00, Mattias Gärtner wrote: > > Zitat von Adem <[email protected]> <[email protected]>: > > [...] > How would *you* deal with macros? > > I would not use a complete parser. > I would use a forgiving parser like the synedit highlighter or the > indentation parser of the codetools. > > Why is this emphasis on the parser being '*forgiving*'? > > Why wouldn't I want to know about the ugly truth that the code I just wrote > will not compile? > > Why should I have to wait till I compile the rubbish I produced to find out > that it is indeed worthless? > > -- > Cheers, > > Adem > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > >
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
