On 6/4/2010 06:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Then switch to fpGUI for embedded systems. It works perfectly and is
low on resources and small size executables. Plus fpGUI is a lot more
modern in looks than GTK1 - and fpGUI is still actively being
developed. :)
Yes, it's still being developed- and from elsewhere in the thread it
appears that it's nowhere near a drop-in replacement for GTK1:
IIUC: this is only because the LCL_fpGUI interface is not complete but someone
has been working on that if i recall what i've read and understood it correctly...
if it were I'm sure that nobody at all would have any problems switching
existing projects to use it.
Look, another way of tackling this would be to stop work on fpGUI and
for everybody to have an all-out push to get both GTK1 and GTK2 reliable
and with similar levels of functionality for some arbitrary release.
Then put both GTK1 and 2 onto maintenance-only and get fpGUI up to the
same level of functionality so that it is a drop-in replacement for
GTK1. Then start moving forwards again with fpGUI and GTK2.
unless i misunderstand something, once the LCL_fpGUI interface stuff is done,
fpGUI will be a "drop-in" replacement for any of the existing interfaces...
GTK1, GTK2, QT, WIN-whatever, etc...
do i misunderstand that?
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus