theo schrieb:

Yes, this is probably cleaner than my workaround with "none".
But it needs one extra boolean field, and the "none" solution should be safe too. (Afaik there is no system where "none" without slashes is a valid absolute path).

I typically use '<none>' to signal invalid entries, easily recognizable by the first character. A non-visual solution were e.g. a #0, that should be an illegal value in most cases, but still is a non-empty string.

DoDi


--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to