2010/7/13 Juha Manninen <[email protected]>: > Noli Sicad wrote: >> Then why don't you use VitualTreeView in Lazarus? It is supported in >> Lazarus. I just install it the other day. > > Actually I would need it for the Lazarus code itself, for converter > configuration. > VirtualTreeView is not very big but it adds some more kilobytes to Lazarus > code. I hope it is OK for other developers.
I don't mind the extra bytes in the executable, but I fear the amount of extra source code in the Lazarus svn tree. People might think that VirtualTreeView is maintained as part of the Lazarus sources too. Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
