On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:19:34 +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>waldo kitty wrote: > >> FWIW: there is probably a FORTRAN compiler for *nix... whether or not it >> can take your existing FORTRAN code and compile it to a library for *nix >> is another question... and, as noted above, there may not be any real >> need to keep those routines in FORTRAN... it may be pretty easy to >> convert them to PASCAL (or any other of today's languages)... it really >> depends on the code and, in the case of math functions, the precision >> needed... > >Yes, I believe there's a GNU FORTRAN but other than eyeballing it to see >what sort of parallelisation facilities it provides I've not touched >FORTRAN for around 30 years. > The author is an academcian and he used Fortran for number crunching (there is tomography involved) because he was not comfortable with pascal and there were code examples available from universities he could use. So he got us to buy the Intel compiler to make the DLL:s. Then he left after a few years and noone else understands the code. I started out in the 60:s with Algol at university, then used assembler in the 70:s, then pascal and C in the 80:s anmd finally object pascal from about 1995 util now (have used all Delphi versions until 7 and then BDS2006). Can't get my head around the fortran code.... The dll:s are each about 16-20 files varying between 70 to 400 lines of fortran source code. -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
