Am 13.10.2010 20:07, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 13 October 2010 19:26, Martin<[email protected]> wrote:
actually, I think in dwarf 3 the lower bound can be defined (and from a
search in fpc sources, it may even be done...); but I couldn't get dwarf 3
results to work at all...
Probably the wrong list to ask, but what is the state of dwarf3
support in FPC? From the many dwarf articles I have read tonight, it
seems dwarf 3 final spec was released back in January 2006, so I would
imagine any new debugger improvements must use dwarf 3 instead of
dwarf 2? But as for as I know the default dwarf format used by FPC is
dwarf 2... why is that?
The reason why DWARF 3 isn't used might be the following:
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2010-October/022297.html
Regards,
Sven
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
