2010/10/18 Michael Schnell <[email protected]>: > On 10/18/2010 04:42 PM, Sven Barth wrote: >> >> Ehm... "unit libc" <> "interfacing/using libc". The libc unit is a relict >> from Kylix times and is basically i386 only. But interfacing with/using libc >> is not a bad thing (TM) per se. >> > I do agree. I was not completely convinced that not using the pthreadlib in > the libc for managing the thread stuff. I suppose there are pros and cons > (see the "Threadvar" discussion). I suppose when getting at that a > discussion what and how stuff from *libc*.so is to be accessed. >
Michael, please read http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/libc_unit#The_problem_with_unit_libc, so you know what you are talking about and understand the difference between library libc and unit libc. Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
