On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:26 +0100 Bo Berglund <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:54:23 +0100, Bo Berglund > <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Anyway, now I understand what is going on and the package is > >recognized. > > > > Well, I was a bit premature. > I now looked in the config dirs and located the packagefiles.xml files > and had a look inside. > This is what I found: > > Original Lazarus config: > <Item7> > <Name Value="SdpoSerialLaz"/> > <Version Minor="1" Release="4"/> > <Filename > Value="C:\Programs\lazarus\components\sdpo\sdposeriallaz.lpk"/> > </Item7> > > New SVN version from the fixes branch: > <Item6> > <Name Value="SdpoSerialLaz"/> > <Version Minor="1" Release="4"/> > <Filename Value="components\Sdpo\sdposeriallaz.lpk"/> > </Item6> > > Why is one Lazarus using a relative path and the other an absolute > path? 0.9.29 uses relative paths for packages in the Lazarus source directory. When a new Lazarus is installed under a different path (e.g. the path contains the Lazarus version) all new packages are used automatically. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
