You mean "to TEACH people" and you assume too much about me. 2010/11/29 Joost van der Sluis <[email protected]>
> On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 17:40 -0200, Alexsander Rosa wrote: > > But it is transparent to the libpq programmer; why it's not > > transparent with sqldb? > > To learn people that they have to use transactions. There are only a > very few cases in which you don't need a transaction. > > But most programmers do a: not know how why transactions are there and > how they should be used, or b: are too sloppy to use them properly. > > That most people do not understand what a transaction is and where it is > for, is demonstrated by you thinking that it was possible to do > something with Postgres without a transaction. For each transactional > database it is completely impossible to work without transactions. Or > else it woudn't be a transactional database anymore. > > I tried to explain this to you earlier, but you preferred to use Zeos. > That's ok with me. But it would be better if you learn how to use > transactions properly. (With Zeos or sqldb, doesn't matter) > > Joost. > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa Linux User #113925 "Extremismo na defesa da liberdade não é defeito. Moderação na busca por justiça não é virtude." -- Barry Goldwater
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
