On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 01:43 +0000, Paulo Costa wrote:
Because:
- A lfm parser can be easier to code/maintain than a pascal code parser.
- It is easier to deal with properties appearing and disappearing.
- It just works (tm) (there are other brands using this slogan with
great success :)
Same with fpGUI UI Designer's design. Also, if it was such a great idea
to separate the UI code into another file, why is Borland the only
company to do that. .NET, Qt GTK etc all use embedded source code
describing the UI. :)
It is not correct that they are the only one. There are others:
* VB
* XUL
* Windows itself. (prior to .Net)
And maybe Borland is the only one to have done it right.
They don't need to change, why would they ?
The system as it is works just fine.
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
