On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 02:09:26PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > Because: > > - A lfm parser can be easier to code/maintain than a pascal code parser. > > I forgot to mention. The pascal code describing the UI is rather simple. > You DON'T need a full object pascal parser. Hence the reason I rather > use my own simple parser than something heavyweight like the passrc > parser in FCL.
If you can't edit it, and must maintain the designer data outside the main unit source, I fail to see the advantage of this approach. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
