2011/1/21 Bo Berglund <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:14:15 +0100, Vincent Snijders > <[email protected]> wrote:
You forgot to quote this part: > 2011/1/20 Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> >> And with this whole mess I would end by saying: And that is why you >> will not see me ever use a Stored Procedure! 99.99% of the time they >> contain business logic, which doesn't belong in the data layer of your >> application in any case - you can't unit test that business logic. > > Why can't that business logic be unit tested ? I did it myself many times. > It results into a more maintenable code(Object Pascal and SQL) and a high > perfoming applications. The above is off topic for the Lazarus: Why Graeme doesn't use stored procdures and what valid and invalid reasons he may have for that. > > >>This is off topic, please use lazarus-other list. > > My question was why a database component that ships with *lazarus* > would not work with a perfectly legitimate SQL command (which we have > used for years in Delphi with ADO). That is on topic. How to use stored procedure with Lazarus. > > I assumed at first that I was doing something illegal or so for > lazarus/fpc so I asked here. Did not think it would be off-topic. AFAIK, in this thread you did not post off topic. And I did not say so. > > Is there a list of acceptable topics somewhere so one could check > before posting? No, there is no such list. Most people can decide for them self what is on topic for the general Lazarus list. If they make a mistake and I fear more may follow, I help to remind them that this the Lazarus list and a discuss about anything list. Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
