On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> wrote: > But that doesn't limit the developer, because the developer could simply > define a new string type and use that instead.
Maybe I used a bad example, but anyway, var parameters need to be exact > So for every possible encoding and code page you want to make a new > function? Of course not! Only the important ones. For me this means only UTF-8, but I supposed some people might want UTF-16 too. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
