On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16:55PM +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is all undecided. I lean towards splitting operating system targets > > into a utf8 and a utf16 one for most platforms(*), since nobody will ever > > agree > > on one encoding. ?Not even per platform. > > > > (*) and a legacy "ansi" one if need be. > > Why do we need "targets"? > > Wouldn't it be better to simply duplicate all string functions for > utf8 and utf16 and ansi if necessary?
How do you duplicate every usage of "string" in the entire Lazarus tree? -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
