> If so, then I wouldn't waist any more of my time on working on the > cpstrnew branch
FPC still follows the thumb rule (notice the thumb rule): the person who implements a certain feature, decides. E.g. if somebody comes up with a working code paged string implementation without breaking existing stuff too hard, I'am pretty sure it will be added. Of course, somebody else might pop up and add Delphi like support. > (which I have been doing quietly on my own). Always bad. Release sources early, release sources often ;) > > then why use FPC - just switch to the > "real" thing [Delphi]. Everybody is free do to so, at least I'am not dogmatic about this as long as you use some compiled pascal flavour :) -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
