On 2/19/11 10:27 AM, Alexander Klenin wrote:
3. The uses section is split, reducing readability. I personally find the opposite -- if properly maintained, the separate "uses" lists are giving reader additional information about unit dependencies and at the same time reduce the amount of dependencies one must scan in order to understand only the unit interface (i. e. to use, not develop, a unit)
I also find the opposite.
Using a unit in a uses clause defines the scope of the usage. I think the overriding principle should be to limit the scope to only the code that requires it. Using a unit in the implementation section adds valuable info to the reader that the used unit is NOT needed to define the current unit's interface.
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
