Am 22.02.2011 09:58, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > Op 2011-02-22 10:44, Florian Klaempfl het geskryf: >> Delphi clone/non delphi clone? Does it ring bells? You always tell us: >> don't do a delphi clone. Then we don't do it and you cry. > > Well make up your bloody mind??? If you want to make FPC a Delphi clone, > then stick to it. Having some areas cloned and some not, makes things a > little annoying.
No problem, if you don't troll, somebody else will. > That was what I was complaining about that time. You followed the generics discussions? > An NO, I'll never shed a tear over FPC - that's all your wishful thinking. I'am glad to hear that you're always happy about FPC :) > > >> An even better argument not to change it :) Even in ObjFPC mode a string >> is a shortstring for years. > > Out of curiosity, why does ObjFPC mode default to ShortString and not > AnsiString? Why break existing code for nothing? Such a change would simply steel people their time while the gain is zero: people interested in string = ansistrings can either add $H/-Sh to their project when migrating from shortstring to ansistring or they can replace explicitly string by ansistring. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
