Am 22.02.2011 11:11, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > Op 2011-02-22 11:27, Florian Klaempfl het geskryf: >> >> Feel free to do so, we are all waiting for at least five years for > > Wasn't that what Hans-Peter (or somebody) recently tried?? But from the > discussions I read, the changes were "to radical" from a non-core > member, so as usual, the changes get declined....
Please stay with the truth: first of all, the proposed changes so far had nothing to do with improving unit loading. Further, none of the changes were working. You'd kill me, if I merged those changes breaking FPC completely :) Last but not least: the radical changes (also far from working changes in the sense of no regressions) which get declined aimed on a multi language front end for FPC. While this in theory is imaginable, I expect a lot of dedication before I merge such changes into FPC: it means not only a hacked parser, but also a complete new runtime environment, complete reorganisation of the directory structures and build processes, a lot of new regression tests etc. Considering http://fpcext.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=fpcext/compiler;a=summary the dedication and interest is little. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
