On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:53:55 +0200 Hans-Peter Diettrich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schrieb: > > > The state file contains the last compiler parameters. If there is no > > state file then the IDE does not know the last params, so it assumes > > the worst and compiles with -B. > > That explains the rebuild, but not why it fails. > > > >> How can a file from 2010 be newer than a just compiled one? > > > > Maybe you are looking at the wrong easy_dock_images.lrs? > > The IDE does not check/warn for ambiguous include files. > > Unlikely, because: > > >> No such problem occurs with a different --pcp (not the one Lazarus was > >> built with), same compiler. I'd understand when problems occur with > >> different options in *different* configs, but different options in the > >> *same* config??? > > with same Lazarus directory and other pathes. Yes, but I doubt that the compiler sees ghosts. If the compiler says it sees a newer include file, then check the include path and compile with -vut. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
