On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:49:59 +0200 Hans-Peter Diettrich <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner schrieb: > > >>> Only if the documentation explicitly says a method is thread safe it is. > >>> Maybe this needs to be made more clear. Any ideas, where? > >> What is "thread safe"? > > > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=thread+safe&l=1 > > > > A piece of code is "thread safe" if it can be safely invoked by > > multiple threads at the same time. > > As already explained, I'm not comfortable with that definition. Welcome to earth. How do you define it on your planet? > Which aspect would cover access to shared objects by different "pieces > of code"? What did you not understand on the link I gave? > >> [...] > >> After all: how/where can I find thread-related Lazarus/FPC > >> documentation? My wiki search was not really successful :-( > > > > What words did you search? > > I got results on Thread, Threads and Multithreading. > > Yes, hundreds of results per search - this is not really helpful :-( I'm always amazed how spoiled Lazarus users are. I think this is a compliment for Lazarus. :) > It would help, to some degree, if a language could be specified, so that > the results are not crowded with any number of translated pages. +1 Although I must admit I would not use that feature, because I often want to know where a word is used. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
