> > >> Can somebody confirm this for Ubuntu? Are there comparable > files for > >> other distreax? > > > > Both my Ubuntu 8.04.4 and Ubuntu 10.04.3 systems have the > lsb_release > > and the xdg-open commands available. So I guess that's +1 > to Canonical > > for at least trying to be helpful! > > Yes, but for cases where lsb_release might not work- e.g. an older > release- does apt/sources.list refer to a section of their > repository by > name or simply as "stable" etc.? >
apt/sources.list for my ubuntu 10.04 64 bit refers to fe. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-security main restricted Kubuntu (ubuntu with KDE desktop) 10.04 32 bit and Xubuntu 10.04 (with XFCE4) point to the same repositories. >From older versions, I remember similar names containing ubuntu and the codename (hardy, dapper, etc). Ludo -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
