2011/8/2 ik <[email protected]>: > That's also bad. Because I can use for example "with" the following way: > > with area, canvas do > begin > Rectangle(0,0, with, height); > end; > > If you'll have "this" or "self" or $_ (in perl :)) it still contain the same > problem. I prefer explicit code then implicit code. It's more readable and > less error prone. > > I think that "with" like "goto" need to be enabled by special parameter and > not allowed by default.
Yep... I forgot that sintaxe option because I never used. Forget what I said. Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
