> On 12/08/2011 18:42, Martin wrote: > > On 12/08/2011 18:14, Ludo Brands wrote: > >> On a slower system (seconds rounded): > >> lazarus * > >> real 1m57 > >> user 1m39 > >> sys 0m1 > >> geany * > >> real 2m3 > >> user 0m52 > >> sys 0m1 > > on my system geanny took 57 secs (all together). > > laz trunk was faster (see other mail) > 27 secs (450 files from command line) > 16 secs (450 files from project session) >
The system I used to test is a laptop = slow disk. So the IO part for lazarus and geany are larger but roughly equal. Hence the smaller performance difference on my system, but in favor of lazarus. Ludo -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
