Flávio Etrusco wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, absolutely not. You didn't even show any evidence that the problem
is in Lazarus.
As far as I can tell all problems are in Unity, so you could propose
them to add a dialog saying that it breaks Lazarus (among other apps):
http://kenkinder.com/2011/05/18/why-ubuntu-11-04-unitys-reviews-are-so-bad/
--
Please be serious. Of course the bug isn't "in Lazarus" (besides the
fact we certainly seem to be doing something unconventional WRT
ScrollableArea) but the important thing is user experience. Ubuntu
currently doesn't need/want Lazarus. I guess we want Ubuntu?
I'd suggest that it's down to whoever packages Lazarus for Debian/Ubuntu
to wrap the IDE in a script that acknowledges that there are problems
with some desktop/WMs, and indicates why. I don't think it's the
responsibility of the core project to try to detect what's calling it,
either at build or execution time, since that could introduce more
problems than it solves.
Unity is certainly generating a lot of controversy, as are Gnome v3 and
KDE v4, and it might be best for Lazarus to wait until things settle
down and the GUI originators reach consensus before trying to
accommodate them.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/05/linus_slams_gnome_three/
And actually, Lazarus svn + latest Oneiric is pretty buggy even on
OpenBox (LXDE), messing up z-position (e.g. showing dialogs below
editor) and having erratic mouse capture/behavior frequently.
With the usual health warning attached to versions pulled directly from SVN.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
