On 27/09/2011 15:01, Lukasz Sokol wrote: > On 27/09/2011 14:18, Frank Church wrote: > >> >> http://shootout.alioth.debian.__org/u32/pascal.php >> <http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/pascal.php> >> >> >> There are always trade-offs. >> >> In any case "*Show me the code!!*" >> >> >> There is a *huge* difference in the "Memory KB" in most cases! >> >> >> Yes that part is pretty obvious, but without seeing the program code >> most of these comparisons are not very meaningful. >> >> Is c++ memory usage that bad? >> > > I noticed the g++ code of at least the k-nucleotide test is using parallel > processing! > Whereas the main loop of the fpc program was mostly first- swallowing the > stdin, then > /reallocing/ buffers! No wonder FPC is slower here -do all languages get > the same treatment on the shootout...? Or are some more even than others! > > Lukasz > this shows especially when you compare single vs quad-code results on the knucleotide...
L. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
