On 14/10/2011 09:07, Gregory M. Turner wrote: > Not that I fault anybody for using it -- I use it internally, in > fact. But,... come now... one monolithic linear repository relying > on a _convention_ of "branch" _directories_? Each repo hosted at a > canonical url, which we need constant access to in order to get > anything done? A self-described "better cvs"? It really is quite > regressive. > > -gmt >
Quoting Linus Torvalds (from wikipedia) The slogan of Subversion for a while was "CVS done right", or something like that, and if you start with that kind of slogan, there's nowhere you can go. There is no way to do CVS right L. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
