Al 20/10/2011 16:34, En/na Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ha escrit:
The switch is really easy. There are routines which are equivalent to all operations done previously.
But you have to manually (or semi-automatically) do it, which is a lot of work and possibly error prone. While, with utf-16, you shouldn't change any routine name at all, unless you have to deal with characters outside the BMP.
According to this message https://forums.codegear.com/message.jspa?messageID=399964#399964 "Additionally, 16 bits is enough to cover the BMP, Basic Multilingual Plane, which encompasses the majority of today's most widely used languages. Only when you get to more advanced codepoints in some of the far-eastern languages, or are needing to encode dead languages such as Egyption hieroglyphics do you need more than 16 bits." Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es Tel. +34 935883004 (Ext.133) Fax +34 935883007 -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
