On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 19:37, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote: > It is also relevant to note that it is rather messy like it is now, > with 2 versions of TreeView in the Lazarus-CCR being that the newer > one depends on an external package ... the external package should be > moved to the CCR or copied there for private use of the > VirtualTreeView, and the older one removed.
Or maybe VTV should be moved inside Lazarus? -- Alexander S. Klenin -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
