On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> wrote: > Is LNet still being developed.
I sent some patches some months ago including perl-like regular expression integration into TLTelnet, but from what I remember Almindor never answered my mails. Maybe I should just commit directly, probably I have commit rights. > Why not simply use Indy 10.5.x. I checked Indy some time ago because there was a bounty but I was quite lost at how to use it, it seamed much more complex then lnet / synapse. I also disliked that from their website I got the feeling that Indy is just a legacy, it seams they have a new version written in C#. From my experience this is a strong sign to be very suspicious of them. If they prefered to reimplement from zero instead of using the Pascal version from .NET projects I have strong doubts about their commitment to the Pascal version. The tendency of people that support two APIs which do the same is eventually dropping one of them (for example the removal of Carbon from Mac x86_64) -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
