On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote: > Were the changes done as <=2.6.0 vs >2.6.0 > > or are they done <=2.6 >2.6 ? > > In the latter case, it will be a problem when such changes get merged to > 2.6.1
I check 2.6.x at the moment. But changing the code to react only to 2.6.0 as opposed to 2.6.x is trivial I didn't know the changes were scheduled for inclusion in 2.6.1 when I wrote the defines, one cannot support both possibilities at the same time. If they are going the best would be to merge all fcl-image changes. -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
