Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
People need to agree on:
1) Which attributes to support by default.
2) What values the attributes can take.
3) what to do if an attribute is absent.
IMO we have to agree in the first place about the *intended use* for
the notes.
I'm sure you'll have wonderful discussions with the Lazarus team.
Why me?
The first implementation looks like an "Errata" sheet, referring to
the entire document.
If by "document" you mean package or module, I think you understood it
wrong then.
The document here is the entity, referred to in the notes.
It is implemented on a topic level. i.e you can associate notes with
each <element>.
Then the entire <element> is the document/context.
Everybody is eagerly awaiting your patches for the documentation editors...
I thought that we are discussing the roadmap, before any (premature)
implementation?
And before you ask for patches: please document the code to be patched,
so that somebody else has a reasonable chance when putting his hands on
it :-]
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
