Is true, but in the mind of most of this people the pascal is dead. And the better of this people will be even sorry about it ;) After all, the pascal always was an elegant language.
Em 13/02/2012, às 17:15, Mark Morgan Lloyd escreveu: > Sven Barth wrote: >> On 13.02.2012 17:55, Everton Vieira wrote: >>> But JuhaManninen had said so goodly: >>> >>> " >>> >>> The fact is that FPC / Lazarus is an almost unknown niche language / >>> environment. I am studying information technology and programming in a >>> university of applied sciences and there nobody knows about FPC or >>> Lazarus, not even the teachers. Everybody knows about C, C++, Java, >>> Eclipse, .NET, C#, PHP, Python, sh scripts, Lisp, even Haskell, but not >>> about FPC or Lazarus. >>> If those people don't know, it means nobody knows. > > Apologies for my poor threading, but some messages fail to get through our > mailing list gateway. > > Having spent time selling and supporting languages, as well as having done a > university job, I have to point out that you're not "comparing like with > like" here. If you'd asked them about /Pascal/, rather than one specific > implementation, they'd almost certainly have had something (of dubious > accuracy) to say about it; if you'd asked about a specific obscure > implementation of C or C++ (anybody remember AD2500? or Zorland?) they'd have > been completely nonplussed. > > -- > Mark Morgan Lloyd > markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk > > [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
