On 12/03/12 15:02, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 12/03/12 14:27, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Anybody else that can put a eyeball in this piece of code? I think
I've been staring at it too long, and am missing something obvious
now.
Why is FT_GlyphSlot a packed record in the aggpas sources? It's not a
packed record in the c header (at least on my system), so they should
use {$packrecords c) and a normal record.
This goes for all their records. A quick look into the fpc sources
reveals that they use {$packrecords c}. I presume it's a bit too much
work to change aggpas to use the fpc freetype interface?
Henry
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
