Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> hat am 28. März 2012 um 16:59 geschrieben: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > > > > > > 1. One can be offline, the other not. > > > > You can make offline snapshots of the wiki. > > Ah, that is working again? Since when? A db dump is still disabled. But with a small tool you can download the pages (in wiki format) and images. A chm converter basically works. > > And how do I show it? Probably extracting the contents and > properly relinking and indexing it needs to be redone after each wiki > migration. The tool already does the linking. I also implemented a simple search, which IMO already is quite useful. The main problem is that currently ipro lacks many html/css features. And many pages have bugs and non portable tags. These need fixing. I guess a full week, which I don't have, because 1.0 bug has higher priority. If someone wants to help, write me a mail. > > "wiki" is not an abstract format. Even microsoft word would be better, at > least that is COM automatable. > > > > 2. One is versioned per lazarus version, one is not. > > > > A release could have snapshots of both. > > That is not the same thing. A zipped copy is not the same as a branch. True. But it is sufficient for a release. > > > BTW: > > The update problem already exists in the offline version of the LCL. > > There are already outdated links and examples. > > There is a problem yes. But at least in theory, one could merge back doc > fixes from trunk to a fixes branch for the next fixes release. In theory changed wiki pages can be merged back too. It's a simple xml file per page. > > Admitted, neither does FPC, but Lazarus even lacks the theoretical base for > this. Mattias
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
