On 3-4-2012 13:36, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > Reinier Olislagers schrieb: >> On 2-4-2012 9:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: >>> Reinier Olislagers schrieb: >>>> On 1-4-2012 18:28, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: >>>>> Reinier Olislagers schrieb: >>>>>> Is it required to have fpcdocs under your FPC directory? >>> Correction: you are right, according to the FPDoc documentation fpcdocs >>> must reside inside a FPC source directory, so that the Makefile can find >>> the units. >> Hmmm... Where did you find that? > > In fpcdocs/README.DOCS. But FPCSRCDIR may be usable when the fpcdocs are > in a different place (as mentioned there). Ok thanks. I was reading the FPDoc reference manual pdf... ;)
>>>>>> 3. RTL step: noticed you need to create 2 Windows batch files. >>>>>> Wouldn't >>>>>> it be more useful if there were some cross platform way of generating >>>>>> the rtl etc docs (e.g. shelling out to fpdoc with parameters like >>>>>> lazbuild is doing right now?) >>>>> These files can be omitted as soon as somebody explains how to use the >>>>> FPCDocs Makefile to *only* create the FPDoc projects. >>>> Not going there... make files are not my forte at all.. >>> Me2 :-( >> Wondering how you are going to make that work for Linux/other OS... > > Not me :-( > > As long as FPC and Lazarus expect that every user can use a console, I > see no better solution. Except that the developers should decide to > distribute the FPDoc projects instead of the Makefile... As I mentioned: instead of having the user run make blabla > bla.bat: Perhaps you could create the batch/shell files from within fpdoc manager using TProcess.Execute? -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
