On 13 April 2012 20:43, Dawson wrote: >> > Sorry for the foolish sounding question, but who would make this kind of > decision?
Normally the person that implements it - but this is not always a guarantee either. > feedback from the transactions as possible. For example as it is right > now I am completely unable to get lazsvnpkg to do anything useful for I had the same experience the last time I looked at lazsvnpkg. It was very good at crashing though. And now that I switched to git I need more fine grained commit control too. eg: I never commit whole files because I often code for a hour or so making lots of changes, then break my changes into lots of small atomic commits (committing a few lines of code here and there in a unit, until all changes in that unit are committed). Not even many GUI git frontends can do this, but git command line client and the git-gui (included with git can) - and this is vital to me and my workflow. But I guess SCM + IDE integration is maybe meant for the simpler folk, thus whole file commits will be okay in their case. > me. There seems to be no mechanism for username / password challenging, Username and passwords are so old-school. ;-) Can't SVN use a SSH or GPG or DSA key pair to do the validation? -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://fpgui.sourceforge.net -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
