On 2-8-2012 12:39, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> On 1-8-2012 23:35, Mattias Gaertner wrote: >>> Windows: 98, 2k, Vista, 7, 32 or 64bit >> Mmm, Win98.... interesting. >> And no Win XP ;) >> >> (And, just for interest, if win98 is supported, why isn't NT4 supported? >> I know they're different code bases but are the NT4<>Win2K differences >> bigger than Win98<>Win2K?) > > There's a few API entry points added to W2K (which I think are also in > '98) that tend to give problems in earlier OSes. We've got a few app > servers running NT4 and I believe that somebody in this ML has it on > rack-mounted "industrial" computers, but I sympathise with the > developers in saying that there has to be a line drawn somewhere. Totally agreed that a line needs to be drawn. I'm fine with wherever it lands (as long as XP+ is still in it, for now ;) ).
And thanks for your earlier post. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
