On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:38:47 +0200 Reinier Olislagers <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2-8-2012 19:21, Bart wrote: > > Current installer for 1.0RC1 indeed does not run on WinMe. > > > > Maybe the announcement (forum) should remove win98 from the minimun > > requirements for Windows? > > > > I know only of one other person who (at least in 2009) uses/used > > Lazarus on Win98 (see > > [url]http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15352[/url]) > Ehmm.. I'm trying to contain myself, but WHY does Lazarus 1 and 1+ even > support Win9x/ME anymore? > Can't any people who use that just use the existing code forever and > backport fixes themselves (e.g. into a separate Win9x branch)? > Not even having a working installer does give the term "supported" an > unexpected twist. I removed the Win98 from the forum message. There are more targets where Lazarus/LCL work, but there is is not installer/package. For example OS X PowerPC, Solaris or arm cpus. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
