Hi, On 3 August 2012 10:33, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Because not everybody feels the need to "fix" what isn't broken. > > That is a very strange argument when asking for a NEW version of a development > toolchain :_)
I said "what isn't broken". The development toolchain has lots of broken bits. ;-) > But that doesn't apply to the win9x set. IMHO the only good reason to run > win9x is having significantly less than 512MB memory. They buy PC's from refurbished shops to save costs. So they are spec'ed like they were in the 90's - often with 64 or 128MB RAM. You will fall on your back if you see some of these PC's. I brings back fond memories from years back!! > And ask them what their plans are before making assumption. We never make assumptions with our clients. We constantly ask them what they have, and try and nudge them to upgrading a few systems per year. We can't even assume they all have DVD drives, so we still need to ship application updates on CD's instead. Like I said, they don't consider their systems out of date, because they still work fine for their needs. -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://fpgui.sourceforge.net -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
